Tuesday, February 5, 2019
Carol Emshwiller (1921-2019)
Her wild yet disciplined creativity produced fiction that ranged from quirky and playful to downright experimental, and made her a delightful partner in conversation. She was best known in our field through her short fiction, which appeared in Harlan Ellison's Dangerous Visions and, frequently, in The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, but she produced some brilliant novels, too. I suspect it was the very versatility of her talent that made her novels nearly invisible to most readers. Her most powerful novel, in my opinion, was The Mount (2002), which won the Philip K. Dick Award, her most touching novel Ledoyt (1995), and her most playful and wrenching novel Carmen Dog (1988).
I first met Carol in person in 2001, shortly after an essay of mine, engaging with two of her early stories, "Sex and/or Mr. Morrison" and "Peninsula," appeared in Lady Churchill's Rosebud Wristlet. As we walked side by side down State Street in Madison, heading for lunch with a gaggle of other writers, she said, "I read your essay, you know." I don't exactly recall how my shock expressed itself--with a gasp, or an acceleration of my pulse? "It was interesting," she said. And then she really surprised me by confiding that "Peninsula" is about incest-- which I'd suspected but had been too unsure of to bring into the essay, since if my speculation were wrong, it would likely skew my discussion of it unforgivably.
After that first meeting, we met at each subsequent WisCon she attended, usually at dinner with Tom, whom she liked a great deal; and she often sat with Andrea Hairston and me at the Sign-out held at the end of WisCon, where fans bring books to be signed by attending authors. In one of our earliest meals together, Carol expressed an earnest need to let me know that she wasn't a feminist--because, she said, she liked men. I never did figure out how she reconciled that strange equation of feminism with man-hating to her identification of me as a feminist (even before we met) and our always happy talk-heavy meals with Tom. There was never been any doubt in my own mind, though, that Carol was a feminist through and through.
When in 2005 I asked her to send me an epistolary fantasy, she wrote a "Love Letter to My Character Abiel/Beal Ledoyt," which I published in Talking Back (2006). It begins "I've never loved a character of mine as much as I love you. I know you don't want to hear anything like this or even a little bit like this. It'll embarrass you."
The relationship between an author and her characters is, at base, thoroughly personal, no matter its residence in the author's imagination. "I first saw you," Carol writes of Ledoyt, "and began to think of you as a character at a little, homey rodeo in a small town. No real bleachers, just a few rows of seats--as if for a home-town baseball game. You were a few rows ahead of me with a red-headed three-year-old girl on your lap. But mostly you were surrounded by boys--a whole van load, five or six eight-to-twelve year olds it looked like. They vied for your attention., but you were quiet. I think joking under your breath. The kids laughed, but I couldn't hear. You were a countrified looking man. Thin and bony. The kind of man who could never look dressed up no matter what you had on."
At one point, she confesses, "I almost didn't finish the book when I realized you'd have to die."
Her letter ends with "Though you're of my own making, I'm...Yours always, Carol."
I write to her, now: Carol, your strong, vibrant voice will always be with us.
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Celebrating Carol Emshwiller
I'm anticipating a lot of posts in the wake of WisCon from other members of this blog. I myself have a slew of things I want to mention, some of them a few days old. I'll probably put them up a piecemeal. The first I want to mention is that it's Carol Emshwiller week at Strange Horizons. The timing of this, for me, is really lovely. WisCon featured a panel and a set of readings celebrating Carol's work (see the previous post, for Josh's photos of them); I had the pleasure of participating in the panel, as well as a breakfast with the other panelists-- Carol herself, Eileen Gunn, Karen Joy Fowler, and Pat Murphy--which primed the pump of our discussion, rather than rehearsing it. And as we've done for the last few years, Carol, Andrea Hairston, and I sat together at the Sign-Out, chatting and laughing and loving it all.
What you will find at Strange Horizons this week:
"Perfectly Herself: A discussion of the work of Carol Emshwiller" by Ursula K. Le Guin, Helen Merrick, Pat Murphy, and Gary K. Wolfe
"The Emshwillerians" by Karen Joy Fowler
"Introduction to 'After All'" by Gavin Grant
"After All" by Carol Emshwiller
Reviews:
L. Timmel Duchamp: The Collected Stories of Carol Emshwiller, Vol. 1
Paul Kincaid: Carmen Dog by Carol Emshwiller
Maureen Kincaid Speller: Ledoyt and Leaping Man Hill
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Carol Emshwiller is Ninety!
To celebrate Carol's birthday, a group of her friends has put together a collection of materials about her and her writing, including a film by her husband Ed that she appears in, personal tributes, photographs, reviews of her work, and interviews. (The piece I wrote for the WisCon Souvenir book the year Carol was GoH-- written before I knew her personally-- can be found there.) Check it out, and celebrate!
Monday, June 28, 2010
Quote of the Day
Monday, July 2, 2007
Book Recommendation: Carol Emswhiller, The Secret City
I’ve loved Carol Emshwiller’s fiction since I first encountered “Sex and/or Mr. Morrison” in the late 1970s in Harlan Ellison’s Dangerous Visions anthology[1], and she’s never disappointed me. Emshwiller plays and gambols with sf conventions as no author I can think of—not to mock them, but as conceits for helping us to think about and understand our world. This combination of playfulness with dead seriousness suffuses her narrative imagination, extending even to her narrative voice, which in The Secret City (Tachyon Publications, 2007), her latest novel, is slyly ironic without being cynical.
The Secret City features extraterrestrial aliens from a planet called Betasha who live in the western United States as homeless, undocumented migrants (literally “illegal aliens”) who when they are discovered are classified as surviving “Neanderthals” rather than recognized as extraterrestrials. Clute and Nicholls’ Encyclopedia of Science Fiction classifies the “first contact” trope as falling within the scope of its entry titled “Communication.” “First contact” may entail state diplomacy, or a consciousness encounter between two species meeting for the first time, or a scientific study by one species of another. The Secret City offers none of these.
Although the Betashans apparently have strong reasons for visiting Earth, they also want to conceal the existence of their planet from humans, and so they callously kill humans whenever they believe they’re at risk of discovery. Interestingly, though, because they are successful in preventing their discovery (which is to say, they are not in a true “first contact” situation with humans), individual Betashans who are in effect second-generation immigrants lack identity and therefore are as socially invisible as most homeless persons in our society must be. Emshwiller’s novel gently, ironically, and yet soberly explores the social marginality and lack of identity that follows on homelessness. In doing so, she refuses the delights of the sense of wonder that usually characterizes encounters between alien species in sf novels even as she offers us the dry, ironic insight of fresh perspective. The Betashans may be extraterrestrials, but the difficulties of communication in this novel result from homelessness and social displacement, not neurological disparity.
The novel’s protagonists, Lorpas and Allush, are the children of extraterrestrial tourists inadvertently stranded on Earth. By the novel’s opening, most of the original visitors have died, waiting for rescue. A servant remains, as well as the now adult (and even aging) children of the “tourists.” While they were waiting for rescue, the tourists’ efforts to indoctrinate their children against human society and culture effectively made it impossible for the second generation to assimilate. None of them owns property or has the education and skills to take any but the most menial jobs. Lorpas, who is the most assimilated of them, sleeps outdoors and takes the occasional odd job---and, lacking a permanent address, is frequently busted by the police for vagrancy. Allush, by contrast, grew up in the “secret city” in the mountains, where Betashans hid themselves as they waited together for rescue.
The “
In the first chapter, which I’d read previously as a standalone short story, Lorpas is busted by the police for sleeping in an old lady’s yard; when he escapes, he returns to the old lady’s house (in search of his few possessions, which he concealed under a bush) and for a while lives with and takes care of her. I read the standalone story as ambiguous until the ending resolves it, and constantly wondered: is Lorpas an alien, or is he (or his parents) delusional? (The copy on the book’s back cover makes the answer obvious to the reader.) The signs of his non-humanness are his extraordinary strength—“Here on this world with less gravity, we’re stronger”—and his belief that he possesses the power of “the Freeze.” We get a glimpse of his strength on the first page. Because the police grab him while he was sleeping, before he knows what he’s doing, he’s inflicted physical damage on the officers (because he’s exceptionally strong). He’s locked up with the likelihood of being charged not just with vagrancy, but with assaulting a police officer. When he’s planning his escape from custody, he says
The three Fs: Flight, Fight, or Freeze. I hold one of the mice in my stare. He doesn’t move. I count to twenty, then I let him go. Or maybe he held me and let me go. Or maybe we just stared at each other, one creature to another, and then decided that was enough.(12)
And then he notes, “I won’t need to test the freeze. My strength is why I’ve never needed to try it.” In the standalone story, of course, this passage usefully preserves the ambiguity that is absent in the novel. Later, in an incident parallel to the arrest that opens the novel, he resists being “rescued” when Betashans with weapons confront him. His opponents may be Betashans and therefore stronger, but they “look flabby and pale and ridiculous.” Lorpas, it soon emerges, has been shaped by his social marginality into as autonomous and independent a person as it’s possible for an individual to be.
Regardless of his social marginality and his mother’s efforts to prevent his assimilation into human society, however, Lorpas is well enough socialized into human society to enjoy friendly relations with his jailers (despite his assault on their colleagues). He also manages to make a place for himself in the old lady’s household, and is useful to her even as he makes use of her resources. Later, he wins the trust of a temporary employer even in the face of the trouble Lorpas’s presence brings into his and his daughter’s life. Interestingly, although the individuals Lorpas comes to care most for—Allush and the old servant, Mollish—are Betashans who’ve been living in the secret city for years (whom he loves as a potential mate and a sort of foster mother respectively), he is on the whole more comfortable with humans than with Betashans who have not lived among humans. And when it comes right down to it, he instinctively resists being returned to Betasha. If Earth is not “home,” neither is Betasha.
Perhaps one of the most effective—and also charming—aspects of this novel is the shift in thinking that Emswhiller’s choice of viewpoint characters not only permits but demands of the reader. At the outset Lorpas appears to be a homeless man who believes he’s an extraterrestrial being rousted by the police. I found the voice of his first-person narrative so genial and decent that I was immediately invested in his escape from custody; and by the time he takes up uninvited residence with Ruth, a fragile old lady, my sympathies were full engaged (which would ordinarily not have been the case given similar circumstances and a less engaging character). And at the end of the chapter, when his presence in the old lady’s house ends badly for her, I didn’t hold him at all responsible. Rather, I saw him as allied with humans against Betashans he can’t understand because “they haven’t bothered to learn our language.” Our language, he says: though up until now Lorpas’s “we” has referred to Betashans, and “home” has referred to Betasha.
But on the run from both humans (the police) and “rescuing” Betashans (who behave like police or soldiers), Lorpas stumbles on the
Allush, on the other hand, lacks Lorpas’s adaptability and “Jack’s” self-confidence, likely because she knows only the world of the
If the narrative had been told from “Jack’s” point of view, perhaps it would have been infused with the sense of wonder typical of first contact narratives, for it’s all an adventure to him. But Allush’s narrative, though affording us the perspective of someone repeatedly encountering new and strange technologies and mores, focused as it is on her need to cope with a lack of a place, her lack of status, and her painful losses, is entirely devoid of glamour. Similarly, Lorpas’s narrative is in no way glamorous simply because it is told from the perspective of someone who has been homeless and temporary migrant labor for years. He spends the novel trudging through the mountains on foot, securing food and shelter and clothing while trying to remain invisible to as many as three different parties at a time who may be hunting him.
[1] I’ve written about this in “Carol Emshwiller: An Apreciation,” which is available at http://ltimmel.home.mindspring.com And my essay “What’s the Story? Reading Two Early Stories by Carol Emshwiller,” is available on my site as well.
[2] See Geoff Ryman, “Take the Third Star on the Left and on til Morning!” in The
